One of Three Pillars of Tsunami
The smartest way to measure real influencer performance
The Methodology
A hybrid system combining automated tracking with expert human judgment.
70–80% of the score
Our platform automatically tracks and calculates:
20–30% of the score
Youssef + the Aklopedia team manually review and adjust the final score for:
Simple Summary
This hybrid approach is why brands trust us more than normal engagement rate (ER). Pure automation can be gamed. Pure human judgment is slow. We combine both for the fairest and most accurate score.
Simple to Understand
Every creator on Aklopedia has two scores. Together, they tell the complete story of performance.
Raw ER
Percentage
Your raw engagement rate: likes, comments, saves, shares divided by reach.
Think of it as your speedometer. It tells you how fast you are going right now.
Industry average in GCC is 3.1%. Our Gold Crew averages 6.9%. Top performers hit 14%+.
AES
Out of 100
Your Authentic Engagement Score: a 0-100 quality score combining weighted engagement, reach fairness, fraud checks, and content quality.
Think of it as your credit score for authenticity. The higher it is, the more brands trust you and the more you earn.
An AES above 80 means you are real, consistent, and high-quality. Above 90 means you are exceptional.
Raw ER tells you how much engagement you got.
AES tells you how real and valuable that engagement is.
A creator with 12% ER but an AES of 45 is likely faking. A creator with 6% ER and an AES of 89 is gold.

From Youssef
For decades, brands paid influencers based on follower counts. A number that means almost nothing. Creators with 500K followers and 0.3% engagement got the big deals. Creators with 5K followers and 8% engagement got ignored.
Worse, the system rewarded faking. Buy followers, buy likes, buy comments. The brands couldn't tell the difference, and the honest creators suffered.
“I lived for decades in the fog. I didn't want my Gold Crew to suffer the same.”
So I built AES, a scoring system that is nearly impossible to fake and rewards creators who do real, honest work. No politics. No favors. Just performance.
Inside the Score
Automation + human judgment. Nothing is hidden.
Same-day & exact same-date posting
Timing is everything in a synchronized wave. Posting on Surge Day signals coordination and discipline.
Real views, likes, comments, shares, reposts, and saves
All core engagement metrics tracked from Instagram Insights. Saves and shares weighted highest because they are nearly impossible to fake.
Content usage / brand integration accuracy
Was the product shown correctly? Was the brand naturally integrated, not forced?
Consistency across the full Surge
We measure how each creator performs relative to the full wave — not just one post, but their pattern.
Save-to-like ratio, ER anomaly vs bid, comment quality analysis, zero-saves flag, raw ER sanity. Score 60+ = manual review. Score 90+ = auto-disqualified and banned. 16 contests, zero fraud incidents. This runs as part of the automated system.
Content quality & brand alignment
Does the content match the brief? Is the product shown naturally? Is the storytelling strong?
Overall campaign impact and resonance
Did this reel move the needle for the brand? Did it spark conversation or create a moment?
Special context (e.g. boycott effects)
External factors can skew data. Human judgment adjusts for context that algorithms cannot see.
The Difference
What others do
Only % engagement rate
What we do
ER + Reach Fairness + Fraud Check + Quality
Why it's better
One number cannot capture truth. Four dimensions can.
What others do
Big creators always win
What we do
Small creators with high quality score higher
Why it's better
A 5K-follower nano creator earned $185 and outscored a 185K creator who earned $210. Real meritocracy.
What others do
Easy to fake with bots
What we do
5-layer fraud detection on every submission
Why it's better
16 contests. 290+ reels. Zero fraud incidents. Zero disqualifications on the Almarai campaign.
What others do
Payout based on follower count
What we do
Payout based on actual AES performance
Why it's better
You bid your ER. We measure your actual ER. Overperform = earn more. Underperform = earn less.
Full Transparency
AES is semi-automated, not 100% automatic. This is intentional. Your campaign success is too important to leave entirely to algorithms.
Instant, consistent, zero human error
Engagement Data Collection
Likes, comments, saves, shares, and reach, pulled automatically from Instagram.
Raw Engagement Rate
Calculated instantly using the AES-weighted formula. No manual math.
On-Time Posting Detection
System checks if the creator posted on Surge Day, same day, same hashtag.
Basic Sentiment Analysis
Our system scans comment quality, flags suspicious patterns, and detects bot activity.
Where judgment and context matter most
Product Usage & Branding
Was the product shown correctly? Was the brand integrated naturally, not forced? A human eye catches what algorithms miss.
Brand Satisfaction & Alignment
Does the content match the campaign brief? Does the messaging align with what the brand wanted? This requires real judgment.
Final Quality Adjustments
Based on campaign goals, content storytelling, and overall impact, fine-tuned by someone who has reviewed 10,000+ creator reels.

I combine smart automation with human judgment, especially on brand satisfaction, because your campaign success is too important to leave entirely to algorithms. I have reviewed over 10,000 creator reels across my career. That experience matters when the score is close and the context is nuanced.
Built on Proven Principles
AES (Authentic Engagement Score) is our proprietary performance scoring system, specifically designed for same-day coordinated Surge campaigns. It follows best practices and core principles from leading industry bodies while going further to address the unique challenges of real-time influencer marketing.
Social Media Research Guidelines
AES aligns with ESOMAR's emphasis on transparency, data integrity, and ethical use of social media data. We prioritize clear methodology disclosure and protect against manipulation.
Social Media Measurement Guidelines
AES follows MRC's standards for valid, reliable, and auditable measurement. It incorporates weighted reach, quality validation, and anti-fraud principles.
Association of National Advertisers
AES supports the ANA's call for standardized, authenticated metrics. We focus on real performance outcomes rather than vanity metrics.
By combining these respected industry principles with our proprietary hybrid model (automation plus human oversight on brand alignment and satisfaction), AES delivers a fair, transparent, and highly actionable score tailored specifically for same-day Surge campaigns.
Real Proof
Three real creators from the same Surge. Same brief. Same product. Different results.
Nano - 4,200 followers
Raw ER
8.2%
AES
91
Earned
$185
312 saves, 89 shares, 47 comments. Posted on time, perfect product integration, complete story arc. Highest AES in the entire contest, outperforming creators 50x her size.
Winner - Highest AES in the contest
Mid-tier - 38,000 followers
Raw ER
5.6%
AES
87
Earned
$320
1,420 saves, 380 shares, 210 comments. Strong saves ratio but posted 6 hours late and lost the on-time bonus. Still earned more due to higher reach factor.
Large - 185,000 followers
Raw ER
2.1%
AES
62
Earned
$210
Big reach but low saves-to-reach ratio. 1,850 saves sounds impressive until you see it is only 2% of 92K reach. AES rewards depth over width. 185K followers did not protect this score.
* Names anonymized. Real data from Aklopedia contest #14.
For Creators
Higher AES = higher earnings and priority in future Surges.
The +25% on-time bonus alone can jump you from mid-pack to top 5.
Saves carry 40% of the engagement weight. Make recipes people bookmark.
Forced logos hurt your sentiment. Natural integration earns +20%.
Setup → process → reveal. A complete arc earns the story completion bonus.
Reply to comments. Ask questions. Real conversation boosts your score.
For Brands
You only pay for real, authentic performance. Here is why.
Every submission passes five checks. Score 60+ = review. Score 90+ = auto-disqualified and banned. We have had zero fraud incidents across 16 contests.
Nothing is hidden. Every weight, every multiplier, every factor is published on this page. If you want to verify a score, you can calculate it yourself.
Creators bid their expected ER. If they deliver more, they earn more. If they deliver less, they earn less. Your money goes where the real engagement is.
Raw ER (6–14%) and AES (87–91). No confusing dashboards. No ambiguous metrics. Two numbers that tell you everything about a creator.
6.9%
Avg ER (vs 3.1% GCC avg)
290+
Reels scored
5.7M+
Total reach measured
0
Fraud incidents

“AES is my promise to every creator and every brand: the fog is over. From now on, truth wins.”
Youssef El Deeb - Founder, Aklopedia
Creator of Fatafeat TV · 55M households · Acquired by Discovery Networks 2013